[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Anchorage Service Area tally



Don,
 
You are correct.  This is exactly the same issue discussed during their training in January.  The RCR I submitted recently is lifted verbatim from the one I wrote back in January.
 
As far as time frames, I don't think we need to clarify that any further; all parties involved are aware of the time frame and the importance of prompt action.
 
Tyler
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald W. Biszmaier <dbglobal@earthlink.net>
To: Tyler <tyler@dieboldes.com>
Cc: RCR <rcr@dieboldes.com>; John McLaurin Earthlink <jmglobal@earthlink.net>
Date: Friday, November 12, 1999 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Anchorage Service Area tally

Tyler:
    When I met with the Anchorage people last month they were very firm (as you have indicated) on what must occur. Is this is the same issue discussed during their training? Basically as I understand it the vote of a person in the service area is to be counted twice, but they are to vote only once. They do not want the people to vote twice (which is what should occur) once as a taxpayer and once as a service area resident. The time frame of when this will be completeled will determine whether our system sill be used or not in the next election.
    Don

Tyler wrote:

 In this request, some terminology needs explaining. "Service Area" means a taxation district which may not encompass the entire jurisdiction. "Areawide" means the entire jurisdiction and encompasses all service areas.

In Anchorage, Alaska, a service area may put a question on the ballot which requests bond debt. The debt is paid out of taxes paid only by the voters in the service area. However, because the full faith and credit of the entire city secures the debt, the question is voted on areawide. Thus, of course, the race is assigned to the jurisdiction wide district. These questions must be approved by voters who live within the service area boundaries (because they will be taxed to pay the debt) and also must be approved areawide. To be sure both majorities are attained, two vote tallies are compiled. One tally includes the votes of persons areawide (which includes the service area as well); the other tally includes only the votes of persons in the service area.  Quote from Anchorage: "In essence, the vote of a person within a service area is tallied in two columns while the vote of a person outside the service area is tallied only in one of the columns." Naturally, several report precincts are split by service area boundaries and thus contain voters of both types. Some report precincts contain several service areas whose boundaries are not identical. Anchorage is unwilling to have two vote centers in split report precincts as a means of separating results between "inside service area" and "outside service area" at the precinct level. They are also unwilling to create separate report precincts for the precincts which are split between "inside service area" and "outside service area". They are also unwilling to create separate identical races assigned to "inside service area" and "outside service area".

What GEMS must be able to do: The individual report precinct must be able to report the results of the service area question both for the entire report precinct, and for the base precinct(s) which are in the service area separate from any base precinct(s) which are not in the service area. This reporting must be done both on the results tape at the vote center and on any precinct summary report at the central elections office. This reporting must allow other races which are not affected by the inside service area/outside service area split to be reported only for the entire report precinct. Additionally, if it is possible, Anchorage would like it if a single report could show the areawide totals and the service area totals as columns of the same report.

It is worth noting that we have a contract signed by Anchorage and HVP that says we will have this enhancement completed and tested by December 31, 1999 else we have to notify Anchorage by that date that it is not complete.

Tyler