RE: Prelim 1.95d Testing

["Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>]

Initial Conclusions/Observations  based on LIMITED preliminary testing:
Download works on 1-5-9  not 1-5-2  (interim releases not tested)  

Right, 1.95 download vote center label first appeared in 1.5.3.  I have fixed the readme.

Reject blank ballot setting not operational
Observed no change is LCD display for overvoted races from previous releases  

Right.  Guy sent a message out to support last week I think explaining that 1.95d is based on 1.94u.  I assume a 1.95e will appear once the 1.94v reject behavior is resolved.

Here is some additional 1.95 testing that needs doing (Nel/Tari):

• Does the minnesota reports print in rotation order?  This is the primary reason for the 1.95 release.  Candidates should be printed out in the order they are on the ballot.  So you need to download two memory cards for two precincts that have the same card style but different card rotation.  Also, what happens if you have two card rotations for different precincts on the same memory card?  This can't happen in Minnesota, but its a case that needs testing.
• 1.95 downloads both the Vote Center Label, and the Precinct labels.  You might need to talk to guy to test this out properly.  If it doesn't already exist, get a 1.95US abasic report made up.  If you print a long report (or is it full?  Whatever gives you the precinct breakdown), then you should be able to look at the vote center label plus the labels for all the report precincts on the memory card.

 

 REPORTS:  

Okay, you have switched gears to GEMS here right? 

 Joe Dimaggio NOT in bold - had 1 of 2 votes

All tapes, reports and report parameters are available if needed.

Email the database to Whitman and he'll check out the bolding problems.  The rule is supposed to be that only the definate winners are bolded.  So, if there are two candidates and a vote for two, and they are tied, then neither should be bold. 

Great work Tari.  You da man! (er, woman!)

Ken