|
Maybe
our 45 seconds in CA. in Alameda, Santa Clara, and LA didn't have anything to do
with the ballot?? That would be interesting.
Nah, 2 seconds to 45
seconds – something is wrong. Post the bug and attach the database and
someone will look into it.
Ken
-----Original
Message-----
From:
owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Tari Runyan
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:37
AM
To:
support@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re: 1-18-15
bug?
I
doubt it is a bug - 18-15 gives you art in languages and the sort time
is a little longer. IMO anyway - what do the guys up North
say?
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:24 AM
Has anyone conducted a fairly
large size election using 1-18-15?
PROBLEM - Jeff Co Ky upgraded
from 1-17-17 to 1-18-15 hoping to correct modem and audio problems. General
2002 election upgraded to 1-18-15. It is taking approx. 45 sec for a ballot
image to be displayed. A small election - 1 race - displayed in about 3
sec.
I had them
send me the database. Loaded on my laptop in 1-17-15. Ballot image up in 2
sec., upgraded to 1-17-22 with same results. Upgraded to 1-18-15 image in 45
sec.. They have 277 ballot styles in this election. Need an answer by 9:00
am monday when they will start to modify master. The db was without audio.
db with audio had the same results. It would appear this is a software bug.
I will submit to Bugzilla if no one has an answer.
Donald W. Biszmaier
Support
Services Specialist
Diebold Election Systems, Inc.
7717 Greenwood
Rd.
Louisville, Ky. 40258
Office 502-244-8645
Cell
502-314-6936
Fax
502-254-7835
|