|
I can only see this
being implemented in terms of two mutually exclusive districts, the union of
which represent the entire jurisdiction, where the first district includes all
precincts with 5 or more registered voters and the second district including all
precincts with less than 5 registered voters. Define both of these
districts within a district category, then issue the SOVC report for the
district category, selecting the 'I' and 'D' values in the District column
corresponding to the district category.
This
registration-based district would have to be created after entering the last
registration amounts prior to election day, but prior to setting the election
status to 'Set for Election'.
Nel
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:01
PM
Subject: HELP!! Re: State of Texas report
request
Can anyone give some insight on this matter? Gail Fisher
is anxiously
awaiting our call and we don't want to make
assumptions.
Thank You,
Jane
----- Original Message
-----
From: Cathy Colgan <cacglobal@earthlink.net>
To:
<support@gesn.com>
Sent:
Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: State of Texas report
request
> I would have submitted this to an RCR, however after
talking with Rodney
> this morning, he thought that we have done this OR
something similar in
the
> past.
>
> Thanks,
>
Cathy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On
Behalf Of
> Cathy Colgan
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:13
PM
> To: Support
> Subject: State of Texas report
request
>
>
> Jurisdiction: State of Texas
> Date
requested: Nov. 29, 2001
> Date required: Sales
opportunity
>
> 1) For Canvassing purpose: A SOVC precinct
report that list all precincts
> with 5 voters or more and than a break
in the report that list the
precincts
> with 4 or less
voters.
>
> 2) For Press purposes: A Precinct Summary report that
omits precincts with
4
> or less voters without having to select each
individual precinct.
>
> Would we create separate TX reports or
add more options to our reporting
> features.
>
> According
to Travis, these are required by law.
>
> Thanks,
>
Cathy
>
>
|